Month: March 2025

Tom Koor

Your company will fail. V3

Your company will fail. V3

 What is the purpose of this article?

This article enables a discussion about your company’s long-term survival and competitively differentiated returns to investors.

The audience for this article includes: boards of directors, CEOs, the C-Suite, individual investors, and institutional investors,

This article does not provide tax, legal or financial advice.   You must do your own research and fact-based analysis using current and relevant information.

You can download a PDF of this article from: Your company will fail. V3

What are the critical learnings in this article?

Most companies will: fail, disappear, or provide poor returns to their investors.

Most companies will not survive.

Few major companies survive:

  • 16% of major companies in 1962 survived until 1998.1
  • Of the 500 companies in the S&P 500 in 1957, only 74 remained on the list in 1997. Only 12 of those 74 outperformed the 1957-1997 S&P index.  An investor who put money into the survivors would have done worse than someone who invested only in the index.1
  • 31% of Fortune 500 companies went bankrupt or were acquired from 1995 to 2004.2
  • 52% of Fortune 500 companies went bankrupt, were acquired, or disappeared between 2000-2015.3
  • 50% of the S&P 500 will not be on the list in 10 years’ time.4

 Most public companies will not survive.

  • A Fortune 500 company will survive an average of 16 years.5
  • The typical half-life of a North American public company is 10 years.5
  • Global public companies with $250 million+ market cap have a typical half-life of 10 years.5
  • 28,853 companies traded on US public markets from 1950 to 2009. Half life was only 10.5 years.6

Global CEOs recognize that there’s a good chance their companies will not survive.

  • In 2023, 45% of global CEO thought that their company would be financially viable for 10 years or less, if it kept running on its current path.7
  • In 2024, four in ten CEOs believed their company will no longer be viable in ten years if it continues on its current path. The majority of CEOs believed they will not be in their current role in five years time. 8

Most companies will not recover from a crisis.

Companies do not recover from crisis.9

  • 20% of companies grow from insurgency to incumbency, but then two-thirds of them stall out and less than 1 in 7 stall-outs recover.
  • At any given moment, 5%-7% of companies are in free fall or about to tip into it. Only10%-15% of companies pull out of free fall.
  • 94% of large company executives site internal dysfunctions as their key barrier to continued profitable growth.

During turbulent times, the number of sinking ship companies increases 89%10

 Few major companies have sustained value creation.

Few major companies have sustained value creation:

  • McKinsey analyzed the world’s 2,393 largest corporations from 2010 to 2014. The top 20% generated 158% of the total economic profit (i.e. profit after cost of capital) created by those corporations.  This was an average economic profit of $1,426 million per year. The middle 60% generated little economic profit, an average of $47 million per year. The bottom 20% all generated negative economic profit, with an average loss of $670 million per year.11
  • Less than 13% of global companies had sustained value creation in the 1990s.12
  • 12% of public companies had sustained value creation from 2002 to 2012.13
  • Mark Leonard, CEO of Constellation Software, in his final annual CEO letter said: “Qualified and competent Directors are very rare, and not surprisingly, the track record of most boards is awful. According to the 2017 Hendrik Bessembinder study of approximately 26,000 stocks in the CRSP database, only 4% of the stocks generated all of the stock market’s return in excess of one-month T-Bills during the last 90 years. The other 96% of the stocks generated, in aggregate, the T-Bill rate over that period. This means that 4% of boards oversaw all the long-term wealth creation by markets during that period. Even more disturbing, the boards for over 50% of public companies saw their businesses generate negative returns during their entire existence as public companies.”14
  • John Rekenthaler study of the largest 5,000 US companies stock prices rom Jan 2011, to Dec 2020 showed that after 10 years, 42% ended in the black, 36% lost money, and 22% had disappeared. 15
  • In 2023, 0.4% of large companies had SVC (Sustained Value Creation) for 10 years. 10% had done it for 8 years. Half the companies had 6% or less annual shareholder return over 10 years. 16

Major changes almost always fail or create limited value.

  • Only 12% of major changes produce lasting results. 17
  • 50% diluted the value of the company.18

 Most large-scale tech programs fail

More than two-thirds of large-scale tech programs are not expected to be delivered on time, within budget, or within their defined scope. 19

Most public companies underperform the indices.

  • The 1,000 biggest publicly traded US stock from January 2011, to Dec 2020, 80% underperformed the Morningstar U.S. Stock index.20
  • In 2023, 72% of the stocks in the S&P 500 index, underperformed the index.21

Most actively managed public market funds underperform the indices.

Over a 20-year period, over 93% of large cap US funds underperformed the S&P 500 index.22

The average hedge fund underperforms the public market indices.23

  • From 2011 to 2020, the average hedge fund underperformed the S&P 500 every year.
  • In 2007 Warren Buffet made a bet with Protegé Partners that an S&P 500 index fund would outperform a group of hedge funds. Protegé Partners selected 5 fund-of-funds, which were invested in a total of 200 funds. In the 2008-2017 time period, a $1 million investment with Protegé Partners selection would have earned $220,000. The S&P 500 index earned $854,000. In 9 of the 10 years, Protegé Partners selection under performed the S&P 500 index. Warren Buffet won the bet.

Many private equity funds underperform the public market indices.

In the 10 year period ending 2024, the top quartile of private equity funds significantly outperformed the S&P 500 index. The bottom quartile significantly underperformed the S&P 500 index.  If you could have predicted which PE funds would end up in the top quartile, you would have beaten the S&P 500 index. If you could have predicted the top quartile stock in the S&P 500 index, you would have beaten the S&P 500 index. 24

Many venture capital funds underperform the public market indices.

Half of VC funds underperform the public markets.25

What are your next steps?

  • Define the words/concepts/data you’re using, in a glossary. I’ve seen major confusion when the same words mean different things to different people.
  • Your next steps will vary, depending upon the type of company you are. E.g. public, private, investment fund (e.g. Private Equity, VC fund, etc. The following suggestions should be reviewed an adapted to your situation.
  • Ask the question “Will your company be economically viable in 10 years if your company continues the current course? If yes, why? If not, why not”. Ask: your major shareholders, your board of directors, your C-Suite.
  • Review the results of your scenario planning. You must have at least three scenarios: your company fails, your company is wilding successful, the future based on currently approved plans and
  • Based on the above analysis, what changes are needed to reduce the chance of your company failing. Step one is to consider the talent on the board of directors. Step two is to consider the talent in the C-Suite. Additional steps are specific to your situation.

Footnotes

1 “Creative Destruction – why companies that are built to last, underperform the market”, by Richard Foster & Sarah Kaplan

2 “Unstoppable” by Chris Zook, 2007, page 7

3 Accenture 2016

4 “2018 Longevity Report” by Innosight Consulting

5 “Corporate Longevity”, Credit Suisse, February 7, 2017

6 “Scale” by Geoffrey West, 2017, Penquin Press, New York, Page 402

7 PWC’s 27th annual global CEO Survey

https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/ceo-survey/2024/download/27th-ceo-survey.pdf

8 PWC’s 28th annual global CEO Survey

https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/c-suite-insights.html

9 “The founders mentality”, by Chris Zook and James Allen, 2016

10 Bain website article “The “New Normal” Is a Myth. The Future Won’t Be Normal at All”

https://www.bain.com/insights/the-new-normal-is-a-myth-the-future-wont-be-normal-at-all/

11 Chris Bradley, Martin Hirt, and Sven Smit, “Strategy to beat the odds”, McKinsey Quarterly February 2018, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/strategy-to-beat-the-odds

12 “Profit from the Core” by Chris Zook. 1,800 companies in seven countries with sales in excess of $500 million analyzed.  Criteria were: 5.5% after inflation sales growth; 5.5% real earnings growth; total shareholder returns exceed cost of capital.

13 Christoph Loos, CEO Hilti Group, Swiss AmCham Luncheon, September 1, 2015.  Analysis based on about 2,000 public companies in 2002 with revenues greater than $500 million.  Sustainable value creation defined as: real revenue growth exceeding 5.5% per year, real profit growth exceeding 5.5% per year, and earning cost of capital.

14 https://www.csisoftware.com/docs/default-source/investor-relations/presidents-letter/presidents-letter-april-2018-final.pdf

15 “How many stocks beat the indices” John Rekenthaler, April 26, 2021 Morningstar

https://www.morningstar.com/markets/how-many-stocks-beat-indexes

16 “Sustained value creation – the test of the best”  Bain Jan 21, 2025. Bain’s SVC definition: net profit exceeds cost of capital and real top line growth

 https://www.bain.com/insights/sustained-value-creation-the-test-of-the-best-infographic/

17 Transformations that work, Harvard Business Review May June 2024 Michael Mankins, Patrick Litre, Bain Partners

https://hbr.org/2024/05/transformations-that-work

18 “It’s 8-to-1 against Your Change Program”, Bain website, Managing Change Blog, 2017 June 23

https://www.bain.com/insights/its-8-to-1-against-your-change-program-how-to-beat-the-odds/

19 November 13, 2024  Boston Consulting Grouphttps://www.bcg.com/publications/2024/most-large-scale-tech-programs-fail-how-to-succeed#:~:text=BCG’s%20latest%20research%20shows%20that,year%20for%20a%20single%20program.

20 How Many Stocks Beat the Indexes? Unlike the children of Lake Wobegon, most companies are below average. John Rekenthaler Apr 26, 2021

https://www.morningstar.com/markets/how-many-stocks-beat-indexes

21 Marketwatch, Dec 30, 2023

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-record-share-of-s-p-500-stocks-have-underperformed-the-index-in-2023-as-weirdest-bull-market-in-decades-marches-on-5d3b4cf5

22 SPIVA U.S. Mid-Year 2023 report

https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/spiva/article/spiva-us/

23 “The S&P 500 index out-performed hedge funds over the past 10 years. And it wasn’t’ even close”

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/the-sp-500-index-out-performed-hedge-funds-over-the-last-10-years-and-it-wasnt-even-close/

24 CCC Google Gemini Deep Research Analysis, March 25, 2023

25 Robert S. Harru, Tim Jenkinson, Steven N. Kaplan, and Ruediger Stucke

Has persistence persisted in private equity?

November 2020, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics at University of Chicago

https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/BFI_WP_2020167.pdf

What further reading should you do?

“Is your company planning to fail?”, Koor and Associates

https://koorandassociates.org/avoiding-business-failure/is-your-company-planning-to-fail/

“Traditional corporate governance dooms your company to failure”, Koor and Associates

https://koorandassociates.org/corporate-governance/5786-2/

“Traditional risk management dooms your company to failure”, Koor and Associates

https://koorandassociates.org/corporate-governance/traditional-risk-management-dooms-your-company-to-failure/

“Traditional strategic planning dooms companies to failure”, Koor and Associates

https://koorandassociates.org/strategy-and-strategic-planning/traditional-strategic-planning-dooms-companies-to-failure/

“Traditional business transformation dooms your company to failure”, Koor and Associates

https://koorandassociates.org/business-transformation/5920-2/

“Scenario planning – what is it?”, Koor and Associates

https://koorandassociates.org/strategy-and-strategic-planning/scenario-planning-what-is-it/

Tom Koor

My regular update regarding my learnings and unlearnings

The purpose of this article is to share my learnings and unlearnings, with the expectation that some will be of value to you. This email was 100% written by me – not by AI.  When you send me an email, my response is 100% written by me.

My biggest learnings in the past three months:

  • The three greatest risks to your company’s success and survival are the talent of: the controlling shareholders, the board of directors, and the CEO/C-Suite. The talent pool as a whole must be competitive differentiated.
  • It is impossible to predict or forecast the future. Scenario planning helps your company prepare for the unexpected. Basing all your decisions, plans, and actions on a single, assumed to be perfect, forecast will likely result in failure.
  • Your business strategy is about making an integrated set of choices that compels desired customer and ecosystem member actions. Your business strategy, company purpose, and North Star metric are all inter-related.
  • Most companies will: fail, disappear, or provide poor returns to their investors.
  • The core reason that employees and investors will support you is because they understand “What’s in it for them”.

Sharing my learnings

My website (https://koorandassociates.org/) contains my points-of-view regarding key issues and questions regarding value creation and growth in for-profit businesses. Each point-of-view is a brief article designed to enable discussion among founders, owners, shareholders, investors, CEOs, boards of directors, and advisory boards. I do not address not-for-profits, government, or other non-profit oriented organizations.

 Below are links to my website containing: new and revised points-of-view since my last update in March.

Links to my points-of-view articles:

What is your business strategy? V2

Your business strategy is about making an integrated set of choices that compels desired customer and ecosystem member actions. Your business strategy, company purpose, and North Star metric are all inter-related.

https://koorandassociates.org/strategy-and-strategic-planning/what-is-your-business-strategy/

What are the three greatest risks to your company?

The three greatest risks to your company’s success and survival are the talent of: the controlling shareholders, the board of directors, and the CEO/C-Suite.

The talent as a whole must be competitively differentiated.  This does not mean that every single person in the talent pool must be better than all of the competition. Company success requires a team.

https://koorandassociates.org/avoiding-business-failure/what-are-the-three-greatest-risks-to-your-company/

Your company will fail. V2

Most companies will: fail, disappear, or provide poor returns to their investors.

https://koorandassociates.org/avoiding-business-failure/your-company-will-fail-v1/

Why should employees and investors support you?

The core reason for support is that people understand “what’s in it for them”. Support is emotional.

https://koorandassociates.org/creating-business-value/why-should-employees-and-investors-support-you/

Scenario planning – what is it?

It is impossible to predict or forecast the future.

Scenario planning is a process to prepare to succeed in a broad range of futures. It is not an attempt to predict a single outcome.

https://koorandassociates.org/strategy-and-strategic-planning/scenario-planning-what-is-it/

What is a business model canvas? V4

The purpose of your business model canvas is to provide an easy to understand one page framework which communicates who your customers are, why they buy from you, and how you make a profit

https://koorandassociates.org/the-startup-journey/what-is-a-business-model/

Personal Update:

  • Preparing for this summer’s startup mentoring at the University of Toronto Department of Engineering. The approach was based on weekly advisory board meetings.
  • Continued as Board Director at a private company.
  • Continued as a Patient Family Advisor at Sunnybrook Hospital.
  • Continued my long-term fundraising for the Geoff Carr Fellowship at Lupus Ontario. Over the past 18 years family, friends, neighbours, and colleagues have contributed almost $270,000. You can use the donation link later in this update
  • Continued with the Angel Capital Association in the US.
  • Continued to share with you, and on my website, some of what I’ve learned and unlearned, with the intent that some of you will find value. The learnings and unlearnings are applicable to any size company, ranging from early-stage startups to large global enterprises.

I continue to focus my time to maximize the value and impact of my two professional purposes: #1 Enabling current and emerging business leaders to succeed, #2 Enabling business leaders to have a positive impact on society.

Tom Koor

Why should employees and investors support you?

Why should employees and investors support you?

What is the purpose of this article?

This article enables a discussion about to maintain, or gain, the support of your employees and investors.

The audience for this article includes: controlling shareholders, the board of directors, and C-Suite.

This article does not provide tax, legal or financial advice.

You must do your own research and fact-based analysis using current and relevant information.

You can download a PDF of this article from: https://koorandassociates.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/why-should-employees-and-investors-support-you.pdf

What are the critical learnings in this article?

  1. The core reason for support is that people understand “what’s in it for them”.
  2. Support is emotional.
  3. Support has become much harder to get in today’s world.

#1 What is the core reason employees and investors will support you?

  1. They understand “what’s in it for me” and they want that. Negative reasons for support (e.g. do this or you will be fired) create limited support.
  2. Support is emotional and requires an emotional connection.
  3. Lack of support or active resistance is also emotional.

#2 What are the pre-requisites for getting support?

  1. Employees and investors must understand and trust what you’re saying.
  2. Trust must be earned.  It starts with understanding your audience by listening to them.  You need to understand, and demonstrate that you understand, their problem, needs, values & morals, and emotions.
  3. People need to perceive that you understand the world from their perspective.
  4. They need to trust the facts that you are sharing.
  5. Understanding requires that you use words and concepts which the audience understands.
  6. Often people expect that their values, morals, and ethics are the same as yours.  And that they and you have a common purpose.

#3 What destroys support or prevents support?

  1. Your audience does not understand the words and concepts you are using.
  2. They don’t believe your facts.
  3. They think you are misleading, deceiving, or lying to them.
  4. They think you neither understand nor care about them.
  5. They perceive that you are not listening to them.
  6. You are not providing value to them or helping them understand “what’s in in for them”.

#4 What are your challenges in getting support?

  1. Society does not trust its leaders and institutions. 1
  2. People don’t agree on what the facts are.  The world is swamped with misinformation and lies.  Groups of people passionately believe that they know the facts and that others are wrong.
  3. People have a broad range of values, morals, and ethics.
  4. We live in a world where massive changes happen more often.  The natural reaction to change is resistance.
  5. It can be very hard to explain to people why they should support having their livelihoods destroyed e.g. jobs disappearing due to offshoring.

What are your next steps?

  1. Define the words/concepts you’re using, in a glossary.  I’ve seen major confusion when the same words mean different things to different people.
  2. Prepare your plan, which addresses the points in #1 to #4 above.

Footnotes

1 “Society does not trust its leaders and institutions” Koor and Associates website

Society does not trust its leaders and institutions. V6

What further reading should you do?

“Managing the people aspects of supervisory change” An article I wrote for the Toronto Centre which trains financial services regulators around the worl.https://stage.torontocentre.org/media/acfupload/Managing_the_People_Aspects_of_Supervisory_Change_Updated_Links_copy_1.pdf

Tom Koor

Scenario planning – what is it?

Scenario planning – what is it?

What is the purpose of this article?

This article enables a discussion about scenario planning and why it’s critical to your company’s success and survival.

The audience for this article includes: boards of directors, CEOs, the C-Suite, and investors.

This article does not provide tax, legal or financial advice.

You must do your own research and fact-based analysis using current and relevant information.

You can download a PDF of this article from: https://koorandassociates.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/scenario-planning-what-is-it.pdf

What are the critical learnings in this article?

  1. It is impossible to predict or forecast the future.
  2. Scenario planning is a process to prepare to succeed in a broad range of futures. It is not an attempt to predict a single outcome.
  3. Your strategy is one component of scenario planning.
  4. Scenario planning is not enough for success and survival. Your need a competitively differentiated talent pool (board of directors, CEO, C-Suite, etc.)

Why do you need scenario planning?

  1. It is impossible to predict or forecast the future.
  2. Scenario planning helps your company prepare for the unexpected.
  3. Basing all your decisions, plans and actions on a single, assumed to be perfect, forecast will likely result in failure.
  4. An unknown future provides you with lots of opportunities as well as risks.
  5. Future success depends on your company responding quicker and better than your competition.
  6. Scenario planning helps to reduce the natural biases that all decision makers have.

In 2019, who could have predicted:

  1. A 2020 global pandemic with massive economic impacts.
  2. In early 2022 the largest land war in Europe since WW II started
  3. Nov 30, 2022 ChatGPT was announced, and the Generative AI revolution began
  4. In late 2023 large scale war began in the middle east.
  5. Jan 20, 2025 President Trump was inaugurated.  Massive changes within the US Government and around the world began immediately.

The future is a black swan. 

What is scenario planning?

  1. Scenario planning is a process to prepare to succeed in a broad range of futures. It is not an attempt to predict a single outcome.
  2. Your strategy is one component of scenario planning.
  3. Without scenario planning, you are hoping that you have guessed the right strategy for the unknown future.

The scenario planning  process has three stages

Stage 1 Prepare the initial set of scenarios

  1. This is a one-time event.
  2. There are a minimum of three scenarios: 1) the base case which represents your current strategy, strategic plan, and related plans; 2) your company fails in the future; 3) your company is a wild success in the future.

Stage 2 Monitor the external and internal factors of your scenarios on an ongoing basis

  1. Has anything happened which requires your strategy to change?
  2. Has anything happened which requires updates to your scenarios, including your base case which represents your strategy and strategic plan

Stage 3 Update your scenarios.

  1. You may need to create new ones

What is the definition of a scenario?

A scenario is a point-in-time description of your company and its environment. The description may include:

#1 External Components e.g.

  1. Key members of your company’s ecosystem E.g. competitors, suppliers, partners, politicians and regulators,
  2. Technology
  3. The economy
  4. The talent pool
  5. Demographics
  6. Social upheaval – from local to global.  This includes war.
  7. Climate change

# 2 Internal components e.g.

  1. The talent pool – board of directors, CEO, C-Suite, etc.
  2. Processes
  3. Technology
  4. Knowledge
  5. The ability or inability to quickly learn and change

#3 4 different scopes to consider

  1. What will the world look like?
  2. What will the countries you operate in look like?
  3. What will your marketplace look like?
  4. What will your company look like?

#4 A scenario has multiple points in time e.g.

  1. Today The current situation
  2. Year by year into the future.
  3. The second last year is the final year of your value creation plan.
  4. The last year is at least 10 years out.

#5 Trigger points

  1. You may identify changes in external and internal factor which will require immediate revisions to your scenario.

What is a very simple example of a scenario?

Appendix A has an illustration of a very simple scenario, created by a one sentence prompt to the free version ChatGPT.

Why will one of your target years be 10+ years?

Many organizations make decisions and take actions where the outcome can be more 10+ years. Some examples include:

  1. Some Japanese companies look out 100 years to see if they will survive and prosper
  2. Some organizations start their talent recruit in school with students as early as 10 years old. One example of why do this is because many students start to lose interest in STEM subjects between the ages of 11 and 15.
  3. Private Equity firms are often focused on maximizing value creation by the years 10-12.
  4. New planes, natural resources development, and other investments may take more than 10 years to pay off.
  5. Demographic and immigration change can take a long time to transform a country.
  6. Families with large wealth can have a multi-generational perspective.
  7. Government policy and legislation can have a long-term impact.
  8. The appointment of supreme court judges can transform a country over the long-term.
  9. Hiring permanent employees may be a long-term commitment.

Is scenario planning enough to ensure your future business success?

  1. Scenario planning is not enough.
  2. You need the right talent (board of directors, CEO, C-Suite, etc.) to be able to make decisions and execute more quickly and effectively than the competition.
  3. Your team of talent needs to be competitively differentiated.  This does not mean that every single person is the best in the world.

What further reading should you do?

  1. “Your company will fail” Most companies will fail, disappear, or provide poor investor returns.

https://koorandassociates.org/avoiding-business-failure/your-company-will-fail-v1/

What is your business strategy?

https://koorandassociates.org/strategy-and-strategic-planning/what-is-your-business-strategy/

What are your next steps?

#1 Define the words/concepts you’re using, in a glossary.  I’ve seen major confusion when the same words mean different things to different people.

#2 Outline the three stages of scenario planning.

#3 Identify who is develops the scenarios.  Consider using 3rd parties (such as MBA interns) to create success and failure scenarios.

#4 Complete Stage 1 – creation of three scenarios – in one week.

#5 Launch stages 2 and 3.

#6 Learn and improve on an ongoing basis.

Appendix A scenario created by the free version of ChatGPT

The intent of this simple scenario is to generate discussion.  The scenario is not intended to be accurate in terms of the cause-and-effect relationships. I am not recommending the use of ChatGPT vs other AI tools.

My prompt to ChatGPT

Create a scenario for a hypothetical Canadian bank called OldBank, in which the bank fails in 2030. Include: financial metrics, political changes around the world, and technology developments from China and Africa. List what happens year by year, starting with 2025

The response from ChatGPT

The Collapse of OldBank: A Year-by-Year Breakdown (2025–2030)

OldBank, a once-stable Canadian financial institution with deep roots in conservative banking, faces a dramatic collapse by 2030 due to a combination of poor financial management, political instability, and disruptive technological shifts from China and Africa.

2025: Early Signs of Strain

  • Financial Metrics:
    • OldBank reports a 3% decline in profits due to higher-than-expected loan defaults in the commercial real estate sector.
    • Rising interest rates cause mortgage delinquencies to rise by 18% year-over-year.
    • The bank’s stock price drops 12% over the year, amid investor concerns over its exposure to high-risk sectors.
  • Political & Global Economic Changes:
    • The U.S. Federal Reserve maintains high interest rates, slowing global economic growth and increasing borrowing costs worldwide.
    • Canada’s federal government tightens banking regulations in response to growing concerns over housing market instability.
  • Technological Developments (China & Africa):
    • China’s central bank launches a global digital yuan initiative, allowing international trade to bypass traditional banking systems.
    • African fintech companies introduce blockchain-based banking networks, drastically reducing reliance on Western financial institutions.

2026: Increased Competition & Technology Disruptions

  • Financial Metrics:
    • OldBank’s loan portfolio shrinks by 9%, as businesses shift to alternative lenders offering lower fees and better digital services.
    • Net income falls 15% year-over-year.
    • The bank cuts 5,000 jobs due to cost-saving measures.
  • Political & Global Economic Changes:
    • Canada’s housing market sees a major correction, with prices in major cities dropping 20%.
    • Global trade becomes increasingly fragmented, with nations forming regional financial alliances outside of Western banking influence.
  • Technological Developments:
    • China expands its AI-driven financial services, allowing direct AI-managed investments in emerging markets.
    • African digital payment platforms partner with Chinese banks, bypassing SWIFT and reducing reliance on Western financial infrastructure.

2027: Major Losses & Market Share Decline

  • Financial Metrics:
    • OldBank reports a $3 billion loss in Q2 due to bad loans in the collapsing real estate sector.
    • Stock price drops another 25%, causing panic among shareholders.
    • Deposit outflows increase as customers shift funds to decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms.
  • Political & Global Economic Changes:
    • The U.S. dollar weakens as the global financial system becomes more multipolar.
    • Canada’s government proposes a digital loonie, reducing the need for traditional banks in everyday transactions.
  • Technological Developments:
    • China’s AI-driven credit rating systems outperform Western models, leading businesses to prefer Chinese-backed financial services.
    • African economies integrate blockchain-based identification systems, allowing seamless banking access without traditional infrastructure.

2028: Regulatory Pressure & Liquidity Crisis

  • Financial Metrics:
    • OldBank’s liquidity ratio drops below 8%, triggering regulatory concerns.
    • Large corporate clients withdraw over $10 billion, fearing insolvency.
    • The Canadian government intervenes, forcing OldBank to sell $20 billion in assets to stay afloat.
  • Political & Global Economic Changes:
    • Canada enters a mild recession, increasing banking sector stress.
    • The government increases support for state-backed fintech solutions, competing directly with traditional banks.
  • Technological Developments:
    • African digital currencies become widely used in global trade, further reducing reliance on Western banks.
    • Chinese AI-driven financial advisors replace human wealth managers, offering ultra-low-cost investment solutions.

2029: The Final Collapse Begins

  • Financial Metrics:
    • OldBank fails to secure emergency funding as investor confidence collapses.
    • The bank’s market capitalization drops to $2 billion, down from $40 billion in 2025.
    • A bank run begins as depositors rush to withdraw funds, overwhelming OldBank’s liquidity reserves.
  • Political & Global Economic Changes:
    • The Canadian government signals it may not fully bail out OldBank due to the growing digital banking sector.
    • Major pension funds and institutional investors dump OldBank’s stock.
  • Technological Developments:
    • African and Chinese digital banks offer direct international accounts, siphoning off millions of OldBank’s customers.
    • AI-driven credit systems become the global standard, rendering traditional credit analysis obsolete.

2030: OldBank Declares Insolvency

  • Financial Metrics:
    • OldBank declares bankruptcy in Q2, unable to meet withdrawal demands.
    • The Canadian government splits OldBank’s assets between fintech startups and remaining competitors.
    • Shareholders and uninsured depositors lose billions.
  • Political & Global Economic Changes:
    • Canada launches a government-backed digital financial network, eliminating the need for traditional banks in many sectors.
    • The global banking landscape is now dominated by AI-driven, decentralized financial systems.
  • Technological Developments:
    • Chinese and African AI-powered financial services become the dominant players in global banking, pushing out legacy institutions.
    • Western banking collapses in several markets, marking the end of an era for traditional financial institutions.

Conclusion

OldBank’s failure in 2030 is not just a result of financial mismanagement—it is the consequence of global economic shifts, technological disruption, and changing consumer behavior. By the time it collapses, the world has moved beyond traditional banking, leaving OldBank unable to compete in an era dominated by AI, blockchain, and decentralized finance.